There’s nothing particularly great about this would-be Great American Novel, save perhaps its size (1,085 pages). In fact, Against the Day barely even qualifies as a novel. Its sprawling “narrative,” cast of hundreds and loosely intersecting series of coincidences read more like an encyclopedia of obfuscation techniques—riddled with lectures on history and physics and with hordes of horrifyingly offensive and/or flat, lifeless characters. The only thing more stunning than the obvious ambition with which this “big idea” book was written is the degree to which it misses its mark, and the utter dearth of ideas, big or otherwise, that the reader will take from it.
To call reading this book a waste of time is almost an insult to activities like picking your toes and staring at the wall. It covers so much temporal ground (the novel begins around the events of the Chicago World Fair in 1893 and ends after World War I), with a few diversions into time travel, geographical space (nearly every continent, as well as some supernatural ones), and so many fictional, historic and fictionalized-historic characters that it’s nearly impossible to piece together any sort of consistent plot, much less a theme.
The wide focus wouldn’t be a problem if each shift didn’t bring with it such a stark contrast in style and tone. At once the book is an Old Western revenge tale, a boy’s comic book adventure, a dystopian science-fiction parable, a ghostly tale of horror, a pulpy detective story, an apocalyptic nightmare, a contemporary political allegory, a mathematics and science tract, and everything in between, all interjected with a randy grandfather’s idea of sexy double entendres. Just awful. Some passages shine, but there is so much stuff larded in between that it’s almost impossible to keep track or, ultimately, to care. When it takes 600 pages for a main character to show up, you start to get the feeling you’ve been had.
Making matters even worse is Pynchon’s trademark reliance on character names that seem so willfully obscure they succeed only in taking you out of the story. The more ridiculous, punning and awkwardly metaphoric examples include Merle Rideout, Professor Heino Vanderjuice, Fleetwood Vibe, Dodge Flannelette, Dr. Templeton Blope, Hastings Throyle, Nicholas Nookshaft, Wren Provenance, Booth Virbling, Miss Oomie Vamplet, Gideon Candlebrow, Captain Q. Zane Toadflax, Yashmeen Halfcourt, Cyprian Latewood, Chick Counterfly, Linday Noseworth and Darby Suckling. Each one worse than the last.
Everything else aside, it’s the Chums of Chance—boy adventurers who travel the world by hot air balloon—who serve as the absolute nadir of the book, and perhaps all books everywhere, ever written, in history. If it’s hard to care about most of the stony, emotionless caricatures elsewhere, it’s the insufferable affectations of this airborne Boy Scout brigade and their hammy 1920s-newsies-style jargon that bring every chapter they coincidentally float into to a crashing, catastrophic halt. You’ll want them to die. I’m not exaggerating.
That said, there are still moments of sheer genius at work here. This is Pynchon, after all. One could certainly piece together an interesting short novel or three from the disjointed parts. The closest thing resembling a plot comes in the story of the murdered anarchist bomber Webb Traverse and his vengeful sons. Pynchon wrings some genuine emotion out of Reef Traverse’s dutiful descent into the hellish town of Jeshimon to retrieve his father’s body. It’s an absolutely beautiful, chilling set piece. A nightmare come to life. The description of the tortuous cemetery town’s governor (your guess who he resembles) is one of a few instances of virtuosic writing:
“ … Something wrong in his appearance, something pre-human in the face, the sloping forehead and the clean-shaven upper lip, which for any reason, or none, would start back into a simian grin which was suppressed immediately, producing a kind of dangerous smirk that often lingered for hours, and which, when combined with his glistening stare, was enough to unnerve the boldest of desperadoes. Though he believed the power that God had allowed to find its way to him required a confident swagger, his gait was neither earned nor, despite years of practice, authentic, having progressed in fact little beyond an apelike trudge.”
Passages like that, and the description of an unearthed ancient spirit sowing destruction upon a city, work well as political commentary, and as examples of the type of effortless brilliance one might expect from an author of Pynchon’s stature. But they are too few and far between, lost amidst the clutter of a thousand-plus pages of fits and starts, bold ideas and immature diversions. The novel that tries to be everything ends up being not much of anything at all.
Originally published in the Weekly Dig